MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Martin P. Black, AICP, ICMA-CM, City Manager
DATE: November 14, 2007
RE: Major Project and Policy Updates
To aide in the transition for the recently elected Mayor and
City Council members and with the assistance of the department
directors/management team, I have prepared a briefing summary on each major
project and policy initiative currently underway or programmed at this time. It
is appropriate that the newly constituted Mayor and City Council review each of
these items and determine whether they remain priorities as originally directed
or whether all or certain of these items should be brought back for
re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment at a future workshop.
Several significant changes to city policy and procedure where
underway or recently changed that, as a result of the commitments and direction
already completed, are not advisable to be re-considered. I have taken the
opportunity to identify those items as well. Should you have any additional
questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me or the identified
department director/staff liaison. We will formally seek your direction at the
regular meeting of November 27, 2007 on each of these items.
Issue 1: Property Tax Reform
The legislature has proposed constitutional measures for the January
Presidential Primary that may have significant impacts to city property tax
revenues for the next fiscal year. Typically city staff begin the budget
preparation process in January, however, with the additional homestead and other
reductions to property tax reform expected to be considered during the spring
legislative session, we will delay formal preparations until after the January
election results are known and the state legislative proposals are vetted so
that we may realistically plan for appropriate budget reductions or seek City
Council direction as to whether to consider a local ballot referendum or
super-majority City Council vote to override the expected general fund revenue
reductions.
We should continue to expect to see state legislative
initiatives aimed at further reductions to local taxing and fee based authority.
We reduced the workforce by over ten percent to date during my tenure as city
manager and last year alone reduced total fund expenditures by approximately 20
percent. Continued reductions of this magnitude and scope will by necessity
require City Council to consider reductions to the scope and ranges of services
provided or consider increases to the millage rate and other fees in order to
maintain current service levels. Finance Director Jeffery Snyder and I are
primary staff contacts on this issue.
Issue 2: Tra Ponti Workshops
Consistent with prior City Council direction and actions, an evening
workshop on November 29, 2007 from 6pm till 9pm for Tra Ponti and a workshop
during the day on December 7, 2007 from 9am until 4pm have been confirmed.
Since Tra Ponti is a quasi-judicial petition, I have previously
asked that the City Attorney provide specific instructions for your use and that
of the public prior to these workshops so that all participants may understand
and be guided by the workshop parameters and format. He has confirmed that the
workshops must be held in compliance with quasi-judicial standards.
All members of council should provide areas of discussion
desired to be placed on the agenda. To date, the following issues have been
identified (Councilmember requesting the discussion item is identified in
parenthesis): 1. widening of the Venice Avenue bridge and condemnation of right
of way, if deemed desirable (Taylor), 2. Condo/Hotel occupancy limits (Moore),
3. Allowable number of hotel units/rooms (Moore), and 4. Building Height (all).
Planning and Zoning Director Tom Slaughter is primary staff contact on this
issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired or are there
other issues to be added to the City Council workshop agenda discussion?
Issue 3: Pier Group Litigation
The Mayor and City Council previously initiated litigation against the Pier
Group. The case had been in court ordered mediation, with settlement
negotiations being conducted throughout the summer with direction of major
considerations being provided through ‘shade meetings’ between the Mayor, City
Council, City Attorney, outside legal counsel and myself. In the event that you
are uncertain as to the position of the city in the litigation and settlement
process, you should schedule a briefing with the City Attorney to review legal
considerations. I can provide a review of the policy direction provided to date
that has resulted in the current status of settlement discussions. At this time
we expect to continue into the trial as a result of our inability to achieve a
settlement clearly beneficial and acceptable to the city. The City Attorney and
I are primary staff contacts in this litigation.
City Council Request:
Is an additional ‘shade’ meeting desired to review the legal issues and/or
settlement process?
Issue 4: Fire Fee Analysis and Presentation
We remain on schedule to have the city’s consultant and fire staff present the
results of the fire fee analysis authorized earlier this year by City Council.
The study results will be presented for your consideration at the December 11,
2007 meeting. In addition, we will present the option for City Council to
authorize the next step in that process should you concur with the study’s
results and recommendations. The timing of your decision will be critical in
order to meet timelines associated with the preparation of next year’s
assessments by the tax assessor’s office. The Cities of Sarasota and North Port,
together with Sarasota County already utilize a fee for fire services. Fire
Chief John Reed will be scheduling one-one briefings at your pleasure in advance
of that date to provide you with a full opportunity to ask questions or request
materials for presentation at the December 11, 2007 meeting.
City Council Request:
No action required until consideration at the December 11, 2007 regular meeting
and review of the consultant’s fee study results.
Issue 5: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Workshop
As we prepare to finalize the city’s revisions to the comprehensive plan to
meet the state adoption deadline of this December, Planning staff has
coordinated with the City Clerk’s office to set a workshop for November 15, 2007
to review final changes to the plan documents before the previously proposed
transmittal hearing on November 27, 2007.
I have asked that Planning staff and their consultant be
prepared to review the remaining process steps and alternatives and
repercussions of delay should City Council determine that additional review and
public workshops are desired. Planning and Zoning Director Tom Slaughter is
primary staff contact on this issue.
City Council Request:
City Council direction on the potential to delay submittal/advise the State of
the city’s desire to delay final approval of the comprehensive plan must be made
at the November 14, 2007 workshop in order to avoid any penalties.
Issue 6: Building Height Limit/Temporary Development
Moratorium
The election of a new Mayor and new City Council members, together with comments
by existing members suggests that a formal discussion of establishing an overall
community height limit with a base of 35 feet and the flexibility for City
Council to consider an additional 10 feet of building height is appropriate at
the earliest possible date.
Case law in Florida would support the imposition of a temporary
moratorium on development petitions that may otherwise seek to exceed this limit
while Mayor and City Council proceed through the legislative process to adopt
these or similar height restrictions. Absent a moratorium on new petitions that
exceed these or similar parameters, the community does run a level of risk and
greater potential for multiple petitions to be filed in an attempt to circumvent
or require consideration of development petitions that would otherwise be
inconsistent with the desired policy outcome and ultimate height limits. The
moratorium would only apply to those applications that propose buildings greater
in height than 35 or 45 feet.
Leaving the window of opportunity open for petitions to be filed
in competition with these stated policy expectations also has the potential to
create time and resource demands that would lengthen the time needed to develop
and consider a comprehensive community height limit. Mayor and City Council
consideration of this approach is desired so that staff may gauge the priority
level of this effort relative to other on-going staff efforts. Planning Director
Tom Slaughter, the City Attorney and I would be primary staff contacts on this
issue.
City Council Request:
Do Mayor and City Council desire city staff and the City Attorney to develop
immediate options to begin the process for establishing an overall community
building height limit of 35 feet with flexibility for City Council to consider
an additional 10 feet of building height (exclusive of limits to re-construction
of existing non-conforming buildings, community facilities - like water towers
and performing arts centers, etc.)?
Issue 7: Airport Budget
The Airport Budget includes $50,000 for landscaping to improve the interface
between the airport and adjoining residential areas. I have asked the Airport
Advisory Board Chair and Airport Manager to make this a high priority in their
work program this year. City Council is requested to re-confirm whether this
remains a priority. Airport Manager Fred Watts is primary staff contact for this
issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired?
Issue 8: Airport Design Charrettes
In light of the City Council direction on the master plan alternatives and the
already confirmed schedule of meetings for City Council and the community in
late November and throughout December on the comprehensive plan, resort
dwellings, and Tra Ponti, the airport design charrette will be indefinitely
delayed and only re-scheduled upon City Council transmittal of a revised airport
master plan, receipt of FAA notice of approval and only if City Council
determines future need to move forward. Consultant work was suspended on this
effort and will not be authorized until and unless City Council provides that
direction at some future time. Airport Manager Fred Watts is primary staff
contact for this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired?
Issue 9: Airport Lease Policies
The Airport Advisory Board and Airport Manager
have been reviewing proposed changes to policies on future leases and lease
negotiations. I have requested that these new procedures also include a
preliminary authorization from City Council prior to staff and the City Attorney
beginning any negotiations or meetings with existing or new tenants in order to
avoid costly delays or staff efforts if there is not an interest by City Council
in even considering the proposed uses and associated lease. I have also
requested that the proposed policy include prohibitions or limits on the ability
of tenants to sublease their premises.
Airport Advisory Board reviews are expected to occur over the
next two months. Upon completion of the Airport Advisory Board review, City
Council will be requested to approve or modify the proposed new lease standards
and policies. Airport Manager Fred Watts is primary staff contact for this
issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired?
Issue 10: Runway 4-22 Reconstruction
With the outstanding questions relating to safety area standards and the
federal government’s continuing delays in authorizing the current federal fiscal
year budget for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), we do not expect to
receive any immediate notice from the FAA regarding our grant request for the
reconstruction and re-paving of runway 4-22. Airport Manager Fred Watts is
primary staff contact for this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired?
Issue 11: Public Notice for Site Plans
During the course of community discussion of recent development petitions,
Mayor and City Council had recently begun discussions of imposing public notice
requirements for site plan consideration by the Planning Commission and
requiring that development applications first be vetted through a series of
community meetings between a developer and near-by property owners. While no
formal action or direction has been provided to staff until this point, it would
appear appropriate to consider a two phase public engagement process for all
significant development petitions (thresholds to be determined by Mayor and City
Council) that would require an initial meeting between an applicant and the
community to present the development concept for public review and comment. A
subsequent second public engagement meeting would also be required prior to
formal submittal into the city’s development review process during which an
applicant would highlight the means by which the community comments from the
first meeting had been considered and addressed by the applicant through
revisions to their development proposal. Planning Director Tom Slaughter and the
City Attorney would be primary staff contacts on this issue.
City Council Request:
Do Mayor and City Council desire city staff and the City Attorney to develop
immediate options to begin the process for establishing public notice
requirements for Planning Commission consideration of site plans and for
incorporating required public engagement meetings for all significant
development applications prior to a project moving forward through the city’s
development review process?
Issue 12: Supermajority Requirements
With the overwhelming community support in the recent election at both the
City of Sarasota and Sarasota County levels for imposing a requirement for a
supermajority to authorize increases in development intensity, and considering
that the majority of Venice city voters and the newly elected Mayor and Council
members likewise voiced support for a supermajority standard, it is appropriate
to seek guidance as to whether similar provisions are desired to be imposed in
Venice.
Such supermajority provisions may be considered either through
amendment to the city code and/or through placement of similar language on the
next city election as an amendment to the Venice City Charter. City Clerk Lori
Stelzer, Planning Director Tom Slaughter, the City Attorney and I would be
primary staff contacts on this issue.
City Council Request:
Do Mayor and City Council desire city staff and the City Attorney to develop
options to begin the process for establishing a supermajority standard similar
to that now imposed on Sarasota County?
Issue 13: Joint Planning Agreement
A mediator has been selected in the on-going dispute raised by Sarasota
County regarding implementation on the compatibility review contemplated by the
Joint Planning and Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement. The mediation has been
tentatively set for November 26, subject to the County providing the mediator,
City Attorney and I with a clear understanding of their proposed process and for
the County to clearly articulate its position. The County has not yet been able
to provide the process or articulate a single, unified position on behalf of the
County. At this point, there are approximately 45 days remaining in the
mediation process, after which the County may elect to pursue legal action and
the city may proceed with its review of the stayed rezoning petition. The City
Attorney and I are primary staff contacts for this issue.
City Council Request:
No action is required at this time. The City Attorney and I will report the
initial results of mediation at the November 27, 2007 regular meeting.
Issue 14: Fees for Special Event Services
As part of the Mayor and City Council consideration of the current fiscal
year budget, staff was directed to develop a unified process and develop fees
for direct services provided by city staff and equipment in support of the
various special events held within the city. City staff have been completing a
review of other surrounding community practices and compiling direct costs for
city services.
Proposed fees and policies are expected to be ready for Mayor
and City Council consideration in January 2008 as a result of delaying items in
order to accommodate the hearing on short term/resort dwellings. Planning and
Zoning Director Tom Slaughter is primary staff contact on this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired prior to
scheduling City Council review at a January meeting?
Issue 15: Tramonto Vista Park
Previously the Mayor and City Council approved concept plans for the proposed
Tramonto Vista Park. The design and building team for permitting and
construction of the park has been already selected and confirmed by City Council
and contract documents are nearing completion for final consideration by City
Council. It would not be appropriate to enter into the design/build contract
with the existing concept drawings if there is a desire to re-consider the
fundamental design parameters as set by the Mayor and City Council’s prior
approval.
There is approximately $3 million in remaining bond funds
available to complete the park, however, the city is required to move forward
deliberatively with expensing of these funds in order to avoid arbitrage
violations. Public Works Director Larry Heath and Development Services General
Manager Nancy Woodley are primary staff contacts on this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired prior to
scheduling approval of the design/build contract at the December 11, 2007
regular meeting?
Issue 16: Venice Myakka River Park
The city has been successfully in obtaining $400,000 in grants to facilitate
the initial phase of construction of the proposed Venice Myakka River Park at
the end of Laurel Road. Previously the Mayor and City Council approved concept
plans for the proposed park. The design and building team for permitting and
construction of the park has not been bid or selected. It would not be
appropriate to enter into the design/build bid/contract process with the
existing concept drawings if there is a desire to re-consider the fundamental
design parameters as set by the Mayor and City Council’s prior approval. Since
these are grant funds, any change to design may place these funds at risk.
Public Works Director Larry Heath and Development Services General Manager Nancy
Woodley are primary staff contacts on this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired prior to taking
the project out to bid?
Issue 17: Rusceletto Park
The City purchased the parcel on the US 41 Bypass just south of the Venice
Housing Authority property. The property was purchased with assistance from
Sarasota County in order to provide stormwater and flooding relief for the
Hatchett Creek basin.
Rusceletto Park will therefore primarily serve as a stormwater
pond with passive areas along Hatchett Creek for wildlife viewing and other
related activities. City staff is preparing to begin the process for
design/build bidding and contracting for the construction of the improvements.
Development Services General Manager Nancy Woodley is primary staff contact on
this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired prior to taking
the project out to bid?
Issue 18: Jacaranda Boulevard – Venice Avenue Roundabout
Under the terms of the Joint Planning and Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement,
the city and county are currently completing a review of alternative designs for
intersection improvements at Venice Avenue and Jacaranda Boulevard, to include
the possibility of a three lane round about. The City Council and County
Commission will review the design at a joint meeting scheduled in February.
Development Services General Manager Nancy Woodley is primary staff contact on
this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired?
Issue 19: Downtown Master Plan
Previously the Mayor and City Council approved a concept plan and suggested
implementation program for improvements to the core downtown area. Improvements
include intersection work needed to replace obsolete traffic lights at Venice
Avenue and Harbor Drive, enhanced pedestrian crossings along Venice, Miami and
Tampa Avenues, consistent hard-scape and way finding additions, and landscape
improvements. Prior to city staff moving forward with implementation of the
concept plans, Mayor and City Council consideration is appropriate to ensure
that the scope and extent of improvements remain as previously authorized.
Approximately $713,000 has been budgeted this year in the capital program for
this effort. Public Works Director Larry Heath and Development Services General
Manager Nancy Woodley are primary staff contacts on this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired through the
scheduling of a public workshop to review the plans and direction approved to
date?
Issue 20: Purchasing Cards
Other local communities have recently been highlighted because of inappropriate
use of their city-issued credit/purchasing card. Staff had been reviewing
programs that would credit back to the city a percentage of these expenditures
by using purchasing cards. Finance Director Jeffery Snyder is primary staff
contact on this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired?
Issue 21: Laurel Road and Knights Trail Intersection
Improvements
Previously the Mayor and City Council confirmed for Sarasota County that the
Laurel Road-Knights Trail intersection was the highest priority for use of
transportation impact fees collected within the City limits.
Approximately $6 million in transportation impact fees have been
allocated for this improvement and the county anticipates commencing
construction at the earliest in late 2008 or potentially in early 2009. An
additional approximately $2.4 million in funds are anticipated to be available
for other transportation improvements by the end of the next fiscal year.
With several comments by Mayor Martin and Council members Lang
and Zavodynik regarding the desire to slow growth in the greater Venice area and
North Venice area in particular, it would not be appropriate to continue with
the current priority ranking and construction schedule process with the existing
intersection concept if there is a desire at this time to re-consider the
fundamental design and development parameters as set by the previous Mayor and
City Council’s approvals.
Construction of the intersection improvements will facilitate
additional development in the Laurel Road and Knights Trail corridors by adding
capacity to the road network that by state law may be relied upon by development
applicants to support their projects and if other road links or connections are
deemed to be more critical, notice must be provided to Sarasota County to
re-prioritize the funds and re-schedule the intersection improvements.
Projects under recent consideration or pending in the area
include the Renaissance Project, a super-Wal-Mart, several J&J Homes
developments, and the Bridges. Development Services General Manager Nancy
Woodley, Planning Director Tom Slaughter and I are primary staff contacts on
this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired?
Issue 22: Pinebrook Road – Honore Extension
Previously the city has committed support for the extension of Pinebrook Road
north to connect with a southerly extension of Honore to act as an alternative
north-south arterial/collector.
Consideration of the impacts of this extension to traffic
volumes and flows along the existing two lane segment of Pinebrook Road south of
Edmondson Road would be needed if there is any change to policy direction
regarding the widening of Pinebrook Road along Wellfield Park. Planning Director
Tom Slaughter and I are primary staff contacts on this issue.
City Council Request:
Re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment may be required if there is
a change to existing direction regarding the ultimate widening of Pinebrook Road
to four lanes within the city limit.
Issue 23: Pinebrook Road widening
Pinebrook Road south from Edmondson Road to Hatchett Creek Boulevard and Center
Road is included in the city, county and regional transportation plans to be
widened to four lanes. Sarasota County recently completed the segment south from
Hatchett Creek Boulevard to Center Road and previously the city had offered to
advance fund construction of this segment to four lanes. Sarasota County
declined the city’s offer at that time.
Widening of the Pinebrook Road segment within the city limits
will create significant impacts to either existing Wellfield Park recreational
and natural areas or to existing residences along the western side. Development
Services General Manager Nancy Woodley, Planning Director Tom Slaughter and I
are primary staff contacts on this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired?
Issue 24: Knights Trail Extension
Previously the city has committed its support for the extension of Knights Trail
north to connect with Proctor Road to act as an alternative north-south
arterial/collector. Included in the city’s communication of support to Sarasota
County was that the extension include any improvements needed along Proctor Road
to safely address likely increases to traffic volumes.
The Sarasota Board of County Commissioners will be considering
eliminating development stipulations that they previously imposed that currently
prohibit this connection and your input will be important for the Board to
consider. Planning Director Tom Slaughter and I are primary staff contacts on
this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired?
Issue 25: Harbor Drive – Venice Avenue Intersection
Improvements
The existing traffic light signals at Harbor Drive and Venice Avenue have been
previously evaluated and determined to be in need of replacement. Prior bids
were rejected for this work because all bids exceeded available funds.
City staff have been working to incorporate this work as an add
alternative to the city street repaving and improvement program as a means of
improving our likely bids. The previously approved plans include not only a
replacement to the existing traffic lights, but also a reconfiguration of the
intersection intended to improve pedestrian accessibility and friendliness of
the intersection. Public Works Director Larry Heath and Development Services
General Manager Nancy Woodley are primary staff contacts on this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired?
Issue 26: Groundwater Storage Tank Booster System
As part of the advance planning to support development in the Laurel Road-
Border Road area east of I-75, a groundwater storage tank booster system had
been planned to meet water pressure requirements as new structures are added to
the system.
Funding in the amount of $800,000 is programmed in the next
capital year cycle for construction of this facility. With the change in
economic conditions and the possibility of Mayor and City Council slowing the
pace of development in the Venice area, re-consideration of this improvement is
appropriate to match city investments with desired growth patterns. Utilities
Director Len Bramble and Development Services General Manager Nancy Woodley are
primary staff contacts on this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired?
Issue 27: Enrollment in Florida Retirement System
Following several difficult recruitment experiences with the Finance
Director and other critical department director positions, the Mayor and City
Council directed that staff explore re-enrolling in the Florida Retirement
System. All required ordinances to effectuate the change from city sponsored
retirement program for general employees back to the Florida Retirement System
have been completed and current general employees will have their years of
service bought/transferred into the state’s system effective January 1, 2008.
Upon completion of the re-enrollment process, we expect that any
excess balance of funds will be available for apportionment to city reserve
funds. These funds may provide revenues to support additional work that may be
directed by Mayor and City Council tore-visit comprehensive plan policies and
other land development regulations. Finance Director Jeffery Snyder and I are
primary staff contacts on this issue.
City Council Request:
No action required. Not advisable to be re-considered.
Issue 28: Migration to Blue Cross and Blue Shield
As part of the implementation of the Mayor and City Council’s confirmation of a
wage and compensation policy, city staff was directed to seek lower cost
alternatives to provide health care coverage for all employees.
Representatives of management, each bargaining unit and outside
expert assistance evaluated new bids to provide a range of health care services
modeled around and consistent with city bargaining contracts. Blue Cross and
Blue Shield provided the apparent most cost effective proposal and we are
completing a migration of all employees to the new program with an effective
date of January 1, 2008. Assistant City Manager Mary Holcombe and Administrative
Services Director Brenda Digges are primary staff contacts on this issue.
City Council Request:
No action required. Not advisable to be re-considered
Issue 29: Wage and Benefits Compensation Policy
Following a comprehensive wage and compensation study by an independent
consultant, the Mayor and City Council previously approved a wage and
compensation policy that targets city wages and benefits at the desired range of
between 75 and 95 percent of comparable market conditions.
Over the course of the first two years of implementation, this
policy direction and study results have been utilized to set compensation levels
for non-bargaining staff (excluding charter officers) and assisted in the
successful and rapid three year contract agreements by both the Fraternal Order
of Police Officers and Fraternal Order of Police Sergeants & Lieutenants
bargaining units earlier this year. Assistant City Manager Mary Holcombe and
Administrative Services Director Brenda Digges are primary staff contacts on
this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired?
Issue 30: AFSCME Contract Negotiation
Our existing contract with the Association of Federal State County and Municipal
Employees bargaining unit expires in October 2008 and we would expect to
complete management proposals later this year for presentation to AFSCME
representatives in the spring. In the event that Mayor and City Council desire
to re-visit the recently approved wage and compensation policy direction, it
will have a direct impact on the timing of these negotiations.
Under Florida law, the Mayor and City Council may meet in
private session in order that you may provide your desired negotiation
parameters to the city management team. We expect to request that you schedule
at least one of these working sessions in the January/February timeframe so that
we may reasonably accommodate the negotiation process with the AFSCME
representatives. Assistant City Manager Mary Holcombe and Administrative
Services Director Brenda Digges are primary staff contacts on this issue.
City Council Request:
If re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment is desired to the wage
and compensation policy, the timing and extent of private sessions to develop
your parameters for management’s negotiation of new AFSCME contracts will be
more time intensive.
Issue 31: Police Department Accreditation
The City’s Police Department had been accredited in the past but that
accreditation was lost as a result of management failures to ensure compliance
with accreditation standards. With eh appointment of Chief Williams,
re-accreditation was deemed a top priority and Police Department staff and
resources have been diligently proceeding to establish compliance with national
accreditation standards. Accreditation can serve to improve accountability of
the police services to the community but involves additional expenses to ensure
and report on compliance with these standards. Chief Williams is primary staff
contact on this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired?
Issue 32: Water Production Permit Renewal and Master Plan
Update
City Utilities staff, representatives of our contract management team
(CH2MHill/OMI), and our engineering consultants are preparing required updates
to the city’s water production permit. The baseline analysis presumes a
continuation of the historical growth rates of approximately 3 percent. Based
upon comments and discussions surrounding the recent election, it may be
appropriate to plan for a slower rate of growth so that capital projects are
appropriately timed and available commensurate with actual needs. Utilities
Director Len Bramble and Development Services General Manager Nancy Woodley are
primary staff contacts on this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired to reduce the
anticipated growth rate upon which the city’s water production renewal permit
application is based?
Issue 33: Wastewater Master Plan Update
Following completion of the water master plan update, a companion system wide
review for the wastewater treatment components will be produced. Utilities
Director Len Bramble is the primary staff contacts on this issue.
City Council Request:
No action required at this time.
Issue 34: Annexation and Joint Planning Policy
With the approval of the Joint Planning and Interlocal Service Boundary
Agreement, the city voluntarily agreed to limit its annexation to areas jointly
defined by the city and county and likewise agreed to share responsibility for
providing urban services to these areas. Several property owners have been in
process since the approval of the agreement earlier this year to annex their
properties consistent with the provisions of this agreement and have received
determinations of consistency with the terms of the agreement by county staff.
Absent alternative direction from Mayor and City Council, city staff will
continue to review process and ensure county staff concurrence on all annexation
petitions to ensure that they are consistent and compatible with the terms of
the joint agreement. Assistant City Manager Mary Holcombe, the City Attorney and
I are lead staff on these applications and policy.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired to re-open
negotiations with Sarasota County to modify the Joint Planning and Interlocal
Service Boundary Agreement?
Issue 35: US 41 Bypass Joint Study Area
The City of Venice and Sarasota County engaged in a joint redevelopment study
for the US 41 Bypass from the Rail Trail south to Shamrock. The draft results of
this joint study effort are nearing completion and will be ready for
presentation to the City Council and County Commission immediately after the
first of the year. Assistant City Manager Mary Holcombe, Planning Director Tom
Slaughter and I are primary staff contacts on this issue.
City Council Request:
No action required at this time.
Issue 36: Penny Sales Tax
The passage of the renewal of the local additional penny sales tax will
provide the opportunity to consider several large scale capital projects that
would have otherwise been unable to be funded. These projects include
commitments to several key items, including a renewable energy demonstration
project, re-building of fire stations 1 and 2, a partnership with the school
board to fund a performing arts center as part of the renovations of Venice high
School and other significant community projects.
In order to ensure that city staff proceeds with an appropriate
prioritization of these projects with the Citizens Sales Tax Oversight
Committee, Mayor and City Council evaluation and direction on each component is
desirable. Finance Director Jeffery Snyder and I are primary staff contacts on
this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired to projects
already approved by the Sales Tax Citizens Oversight Committee and City Council?
Issue 37: Strategic Plan and Strategic Planning Workshop
Mayor and City Council approved a series of strategic priorities that have
been utilized to set the coming year staff work program and city budget. In
addition, council had previously determined that I should again facilitate the
coming year’s annual strategic planning workshops for Mayor and City Council.
With the significant change on City Council composition and the
expected substantial changes to prior policy direction, it will be appropriate
for the mayor and City Council to select an alternative facilitator and set
workshops at the earliest possible time. Preferable timing would be prior to the
coming year staff effort on the city budget so that changes in council
priorities could be incorporated into the staff budget process. City Clerk Lori
Stelzer and I are lead staff contacts on this issue.
City Council Request:
Nominate/select a facilitator for the annual strategic planning sessions and set
the workshops for January or February.
Issue 38: FAA Master Plan Alternatives
Airport Manager Fred Watts has been working with the MEA Group and City GIS
staff to begin preparation of materials needed to support the questions raised
by City Council relative to alternatives to existing safety area configurations
and operations impacts. The City Attorney and I will then refine those items for
presentation to FAA representatives for their consideration and response.
We are attempting to secure a commitment from the FAA to have
regional and local representatives attend a local forum to provide insight into
their responses at the conclusion of this process. We anticipate that this
effort will take several months to complete. I would recommend that the City
Council consider scheduling a joint workshop with the Airport Advisory Board to
review the results of this effort at that time. Airport Manager Fred Watts, City
Attorney Anderson and I are primary staff contacts for this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired?
Issue 39: Capri Isles Boulevard Maintenance By Waterford
Homeowners Association
At the request of the Waterford Homeowners Association, the Mayor and City
Council had previously authorized city staff and the City Attorney to complete
the process necessary for the city to release its ownership and maintenance
responsibility of the dead-end segment of Capri Isles Boulevard entirely with
the Waterford neighborhood (north of Edmondson Road) to the Waterford Homeowners
Association. City staff has been working with representatives of Waterford and
the county to complete this process. Prior to completion of the necessary legal
documents, Mayor and City Council direction is appropriate to ensure that this
prior policy direction remains the desire of Mayor and City Council. The city
and all other public utilities providing service to the Waterford neighborhood
would retain all necessary access rights to make repairs or extend utility
service through a blanket easement over the existing right-of-way. The Waterford
Homeowners Association would receive ownership and maintenance responsibilities
for the street and ancillary improvements, thereby ensuring more direct control
over access in and through their community. Public Works Director Larry Heath
and Development Services General Manager Nancy Woodley are primary staff
contacts on this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired?
Issue 40: US 41 Bypass Improvements
The City of Venice and Sarasota County have actively sought state and federal
funding to widen the US41 Bypass through Venice to Center Road. Funding levels
have been insufficient for decades to make this improvement a reality. State
identified design parameters and commensurate requirements for right-of-taking
form existing property owners will lead to a design and construction that
mirrors the improvements being completed for the segment of US41 north of Venice
to State Road 681. Recent conversations in the community and by staff with our
sister community of Sarasota, have identified an alternative approach that may
yield a more cost effective and pedestrian/bicycle-friendly design.
Representatives for our district of the Florida Department of
Transportation met with city staff and staff from the City of Sarasota last
month to review alternatives for ‘context sensitive design’ that has the
potential to reduce ultimate costs of the US41 Bypass widening and to create a
transportation corridor that includes a more neo-traditional design reminiscent
of the design standards developed by John Nolen for the original city grid
system. City of Sarasota staff and the FDOT representatives have confirmed their
willingness to hold a joint workshop for the Venice City Council and Sarasota
City Commission to explore this alternative design solution within our
respective communities.
The initial workshop would be intended as an introduction of the
concepts associated with ‘context sensitive design’ for transportation projects
and would provide a basis for subsequent determinations by Mayor and City
Council if such an approach may be desired in order to move forward with the
companion redevelopment plans under development for this corridor in concert
with Sarasota County.
Assistant City Manager Mary Holcombe, Development Services
General Manager Nancy Woodley and I are primary staff contacts on this issue.
City Council Request:
Do the Mayor and City Council support setting a joint workshop with
representatives of FDOT, the City of Sarasota and Sarasota County to review
‘context sensitive design’ as an alternative means to facilitate improvements to
the US41 Bypass?
Issue 41: Impact Fees
Historically the City of Venice has elected to collect impacts as they are
authorized and imposed by Sarasota County. These now include impact fees for
transportation, parks and recreation, schools, and libraries. Sarasota County
has requested that we likewise participate in the collection of impact fees for
justice facilities (jail and court operations) and general county government
facilities. Existing impact fee agreements between the City and Sarasota County
provide for the city council to have a direct decision-making role in how fees
are ultimately expended and this has allowed the Mayor and City Council to
prioritize and use funds for new parks, open space acquisition and for
transportation improvements within the city limits.
Sarasota County has requested that the City consider agreements
for the justice and general government that would allow these fees to be
collected within and form property owners within the city but would not require
that the Mayor and City Council consent to how or where these funds are
expended. With the county’s pending consideration to site a new jail and court
facilities, city staff have asked that the county provide the city with
agreements that would maintain your ability to determine where fees collected
from property owners in Venice are spent.
In addition, the city does not currently impose impact fees
(though we have a similar fee for capital contributions in order to fund capital
improvements for the utility system). Other local communities impose their own
city impact fees and collect those fees for use by the City in making capital
improvements necessitated by new development.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired on the approach
for collections and expenditures of justice and general government impact fees
set by Sarasota County? Do Mayor and City Council
desire consideration of impact fees specific to city services and facilities?
Issue 42: Public Art
Previously I had requested that the Mayor and City Council consider development
of public art policies and the establishment of a public art citizen advisory
board that would be charged with providing input on proposed displays of public
art on or within city properties and facilities. The City of Sarasota and
Sarasota County have put in place similar parameters to guide this aspect of the
community’s preferences and standards.
Currently, I am under direction from Mayor and City Council to
utilize the existing authorities granted to the City Manager to consider and
approve public art proposals. To date, this has included collaboration with
representatives of the Gulf Coast Community Foundation of Venice, the Ehrhart
Foundation, Venice MainStreet and others to review and approve public art
displays like the murals at the Venice Little Theatre, Venice Gondolier and the
Venice Mobile Home Park and sculpture placements at various city parks. I am the
primary staff contact on this issue.
City Council Request:
Is re-consideration and/or policy direction adjustment desired to establish a
formal public arts program and standards?
Issue 43: Trust for Public Lands Acquisition
Representatives of the Trust for Public Lands approached the City earlier
this year with regard to an opportunity for their facilitation of a purchase of
lands adjoining Hatchett Creek that would allow the city and Sarasota County to
create a greenway and active park area between the intra-coastal waterway and
US41 Bypass. They have contacted me again today seeking confirmation as to
whether the city remains interested in participating in this purchase. I am the
primary staff contact on this issue.
City Council Request:
Do the Mayor and City Council continue to support staff efforts to acquire
additional lands along Hatchett Creek that could augment existing city and
county lands and potentially provide a redevelopment pilot site?
-- Marty Black, City Manager, sent 11/14/07